|
|
|
HOT TOPICS & DISCUSSION ROOM
Click here for Discussion Center! Scroll below for news releases.
Terror Threat to Australia
Loose Nukes Still Haunt
Terrorists Turn to Web
London Bombings
U.S. Joins World Customs Organization Standards
Identity Theft
Prime Minister Says his Government has Details of a Terror Threat to Australia
East Asia / Pacific Jakarta Post
Australian authorities have received intelligence about a specific terror threat to the country, Prime Minister John Howard said Wednesday.
Speaking in a nationally televised press conference in Canberra, Howard declined to give details of the threat, which he said authorities received this week.
"You will understand that there are sensitive operational matters and I cannot and will not go into further detail," he said.
"I don't want to overstate the situation, but I don't want to understate it," he added.
There has never been a major terror attack on Australian soil but the country's citizens and diplomatic outposts have been hit repeatedly in recent years by bombings - most notably in Indonesia.
Howard's announcement came as his government was in the process of pushing tough new anti-terror laws through Parliament before Christmas.
He said that he was pushing a newly amended part of the legislation through Parliament later Wednesday to help law enforcement agencies fight the threat.
Nightmare of 'Loose Nukes' Still Haunts
Europe - Austria
After years of warnings, hard work and billion-dollar budgets, the "loose nukes" of Russia and other nations are coming under tighter control, and nuclear smuggling cases have fallen sharply, international and U.S. agencies report. Despite the good news, however, the potential nightmare of nuclear terrorism still haunts those charged with preventing it.
"There's still so much to be done," said Jerry Paul, whose U.S. Energy Department office aims to complete work by late 2008 upgrading security at Russian nuclear sites, two years ahead of the original schedule.
Here in Vienna, the International Atomic Energy Agency says only a dozen incidents of uranium or plutonium trafficking were reported worldwide in 2004, down from an average of about 30 a year in the mid-1990s. Only one reported last year involved bomb-grade material, and that was a minor amount.
"What does it mean?" asked Anita Nilsson, the agency's nuclear security chief. "That we can relax and go on holiday? I don't think so."
In a nuclear world of too many unknowns, experts say, no one should expect al-Qaida's leadership to abandon its longtime goal of a doomsday weapon. More than a decade after it first showed a nuclear bent, however, there's no evidence the terror group has found anything but dead ends.
In 1994, for example, al-Qaida agreed to pay $1.5 million for a cylinder supposedly holding bomb material, highly enriched uranium, but it turned out to be radioactive junk, an al-Qaida ex-operative later testified in a U.S. court. In 2001, in Afghanistan, U.S. forces found a crude "superbomb" drawing and related writings at an al-Qaida location, but they displayed more nuclear ignorance than know-how.
Now al-Qaida's leaders are either captured or deep in hiding, their movements, communications, finances circumscribed.
"With the pressure they're under, our assessment is that the most likely threat comes from conventional weapons" - ordinary explosives - "because they know they can do it," Donald Van Duyn of the FBI's Counterterrorism Division said in Washington.
Since the late 1990s, sensational, thinly supported reports in the Arab and Western news media have repeatedly claimed that al-Qaida had obtained enriched uranium or even complete atom bombs - from the Russian mafia, from Ukrainians in Afghanistan, or from Kazakhs, or Chechens. But among the more than 730 cases of trafficking or loss confirmed by the IAEA since 1993, no terrorist connection was ever established.
Almost all involved non-bomb material - low-grade uranium or radioactive sources, such as cesium-137 sealed in radiation-therapy equipment. Sometimes workers pilfered material from nuclear sites in the former Soviet Union in hopes of finding a buyer. Some traffickers dealt in abandoned radioactive sources.
In the last known case of smuggling of bomb material, confirmed last year, an individual was arrested in June 2003 trying to cross from ex-Soviet Georgia into Armenia with six ounces of highly enriched uranium - a tiny fraction of what's needed for a nuclear device. Its origin hasn't been determined, and further details weren't released.
Such trafficking surged after the Soviet Union's breakup in 1991 weakened government controls there. In 1994-95, European and Russian authorities foiled nine attempts to smuggle small amounts of highly enriched uranium or plutonium, the other bomb fuel. Cases typically involved opportunists seeking buyers. Investigators are not known to have found links to foreign governments.
Why has activity declined dramatically? "Apparently it's the result of improved security at nuclear facilities, and the vigilance of law enforcement authorities, especially in European countries," said Viacheslav Turkin, in charge of IAEA's trafficking database.
Since 1994, Russian work crews and U.S. money - some $6 billion thus far - have been hardening walls, installing surveillance cameras and radiation detectors, and otherwise "locking down" 600 tons of Russian bomb-grade material that isn't inside warheads.
The Energy Department's Paul, chief deputy in the National Nuclear Security Administration, pointed out that 75 percent of the buildings in Russia's vast nuclear network have gotten full upgrades. "We're very proud of the progress," he said in Washington.
Others note, however, that the unimproved sites hold most of the nuclear material. The pace of work has been tripled this year in hopes of meeting the 2008 target.
In Latvia, Romania and elsewhere, meanwhile, the IAEA and the U.S., Russian and other governments are retrieving highly enriched uranium from university and other nuclear research reactors, and working to convert them to low-enriched fuel. But these "takebacks" are going slowly, and more than 100 such reactors worldwide still run on highly enriched uranium, with up to 55 pounds of the bomb-usable material.
That's the amount the IAEA calls "significant," that is, possibly enough to build a bomb.
Physicists debate whether nonspecialists could readily fabricate a basic, Hiroshima-style weapon, in which two loads of highly enriched uranium are slammed together to create a critical mass, a fission reaction and a blast.
The IAEA's Jacques Baute, a former French weaponeer, is skeptical. "You would get a critical accident. You would kill people around it. But it would not be the same as a Hiroshima." Much more goes into true bomb design, Baute said.
He worries instead about terrorists acquiring a readymade bomb along with people who know how to use it. Others note, however, that Japan's Aum Shinrikyo terrorist cult, with millions of dollars and thousands of adherents in Russia, failed to acquire a nuclear weapon there in the early 1990s despite years of effort.
If they're proficient in conventional bombings, terror groups may be unwilling or unable to invest the time and resources to develop - with unpredictable results - chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear arms, U.S. congressional researchers argued in a 2004 study.
The IAEA's Nilsson finds such discussions "irrelevant."
"If it would happen with even the crudest nuclear explosive device, it would change so many things and be so catastrophic that we can't think about it," she said.
But the "odds" on worst cases will always be discussed, as in an official U.S. report to the U.N. Security Council that warned of "a high probability" al-Qaida would attempt a WMD attack "within the next two years" - a report issued two years and five months ago.
Terrorists Turn to the Web as Base of Operations
In the snow-draped mountains near Jalalabad in November 2001, as the Taliban collapsed and al Qaeda lost its Afghan sanctuary, Osama bin Laden biographer Hamid Mir watched "every second al Qaeda member carrying a laptop computer along with a Kalashnikov" as they prepared to scatter into hiding and exile. On the screens were photographs of Sept. 11 hijacker Mohamed Atta.
Nearly four years later, al Qaeda has become the first guerrilla movement in history to migrate from physical space to cyberspace. With laptops and DVDs, in secret hideouts and at neighborhood Internet cafes, young code-writing jihadists have sought to replicate the training, communication, planning and preaching facilities they lost in Afghanistan with countless new locations on the Internet.
Al Qaeda suicide bombers and ambush units in Iraq routinely depend on the Web for training and tactical support, relying on the Internet's anonymity and flexibility to operate with near impunity in cyberspace. In Qatar, Egypt and Europe, cells affiliated with al Qaeda that have recently carried out or seriously planned bombings have relied heavily on the Internet.
Such cases have led Western intelligence agencies and outside terrorism specialists to conclude that the "global jihad movement," sometimes led by al Qaeda fugitives but increasingly made up of diverse "groups and ad hoc cells," has become a "Web-directed" phenomenon, as a presentation for U.S. government terrorism analysts by longtime State Department expert Dennis Pluchinsky put it. Hampered by the nature of the Internet itself, the government has proven ineffective at blocking or even hindering significantly this vast online presence.
Among other things, al Qaeda and its offshoots are building a massive and dynamic online library of training materials -- some supported by experts who answer questions on message boards or in chat rooms -- covering such varied subjects as how to mix ricin poison, how to make a bomb from commercial chemicals, how to pose as a fisherman and sneak through Syria into Iraq, how to shoot at a U.S. soldier, and how to navigate by the stars while running through a night-shrouded desert. These materials are cascading across the Web in Arabic, Urdu, Pashto and other first languages of jihadist volunteers.
The Saudi Arabian branch of al Qaeda launched an online magazine in 2004 that exhorted potential recruits to use the Internet: "Oh Mujahid brother, in order to join the great training camps you don't have to travel to other lands," declared the inaugural issue of Muaskar al-Battar, or Camp of the Sword. "Alone, in your home or with a group of your brothers, you too can begin to execute the training program."
"Biological Weapons" was the stark title of a 15-page Arabic language document posted two months ago on the Web site of al Qaeda fugitive leader Mustafa Setmariam Nasar, one of the jihadist movement's most important propagandists, often referred to by the nom de guerre Abu Musab Suri. His document described "how the pneumonic plague could be made into a biological weapon," if a small supply of the virus could be acquired, according to a translation by Rebecca Givner-Forbes, an analyst at the Terrorism Research Center, an Arlington firm with U.S. government clients. Nasar's guide drew on U.S. and Japanese biological weapons programs from the World War II era and showed "how to inject carrier animals, like rats, with the virus and how to extract microbes from infected blood . . . and how to dry them so that they can be used with an aerosol delivery system."
Jihadists seek to overcome in cyberspace specific obstacles they face from armies and police forces in the physical world. In planning attacks, radical operatives are often at risk when they congregate at a mosque or cross a border with false documents. They are safer working on the Web. Al Qaeda and its offshoots "have understood that both time and space have in many ways been conquered by the Internet," said John Arquilla, a professor at the Naval Postgraduate School who coined the term "netwar" more than a decade ago.
Al Qaeda's innovation on the Web "erodes the ability of our security services to hit them when they're most vulnerable, when they're moving," said Michael Scheuer, former chief of the CIA unit that tracked bin Laden. "It used to be they had to go to Sudan, they had to go to Yemen, they had to go to Afghanistan to train," he added. Now, even when such travel is necessary, an al Qaeda operative "no longer has to carry anything that's incriminating. He doesn't need his schematics, he doesn't need his blueprints, he doesn't need formulas." Everything is posted on the Web or "can be sent ahead by encrypted Internet, and it gets lost in the billions of messages that are out there."
The number of active jihadist-related Web sites has metastasized since Sept. 11, 2001. When Gabriel Weimann, a professor at the University of Haifa in Israel, began tracking terrorist-related Web sites eight years ago, he found 12; today, he tracks more than 4,500. Hundreds of them celebrate al Qaeda or its ideas, he said.
"They are all linked indirectly through association of belief, belonging to some community. The Internet is the network that connects them all," Weimann said. "You can see the virtual community come alive."
Apart from its ideology and clandestine nature, the jihadist cyberworld is little different in structure from digital communities of role-playing gamers, eBay coin collectors or disease sufferers. Through continuous online contact, such communities bind dispersed individuals with intense beliefs who might never have met one another in the past. Along with radical jihad, the Internet also has enabled the flow of powerful ideas and inspiration in many other directions, such as encouraging democratic movements and creating vast new commercial markets.
Since the U.S. invasion of Iraq more than two years ago, the Web's growth as a jihadist meeting and training ground has accelerated.
But al Qaeda's move into cyberspace is far from total. Physical sanctuaries or unmolested spaces in Sunni Muslim-dominated areas of Iraq, in ungoverned tribal territories of Pakistan, in the southern Philippines, Africa and Europe still play important roles. Most violent al Qaeda-related attacks -- even in the most recent period of heavy jihadist Web use -- appear to involve leaders or volunteers with some traditional training camp or radical mosque backgrounds.
But the Web's growing centrality in al Qaeda-related operations and incitement has led such analysts as former CIA deputy director John E. McLaughlin to describe the movement as primarily driven today by "ideology and the Internet."
The Web's shapeless disregard for national boundaries and ethnic markers fits exactly with bin Laden's original vision for al Qaeda, which he founded to stimulate revolt among the worldwide Muslim ummah , or community of believers. Bin Laden's appeal among some Muslims has long flowed in part from his rare willingness among Arab leaders to surround himself with racially and ethnically diverse followers, to ignore ancient prejudices and national borders. In this sense of utopian ambition, the Web has become a gathering place for a rainbow coalition of jihadists. It offers al Qaeda "a virtual sanctuary" on a global scale, Rand Corp. terrorism specialist Bruce Hoffman said. "The Internet is the ideal medium for terrorism today: anonymous but pervasive."
In Afghanistan, the Taliban banned television and even toothbrushes as forbidden modern innovations. Yet al Qaeda, led by educated and privileged gadget hounds, adapted early and enthusiastically to the technologies of globalization, and its Arab volunteers managed to evade the Taliban's screen-smashing technology police.
Bin Laden used some of the first commercial satellite telephones while hiding out in Afghanistan. He produced propaganda videos with hand-held cameras long before the genre became commonplace. Bin Laden's sons played computer games in their compound in Jalalabad, recalled the journalist Abdel Bari Atwan, who interviewed bin Laden late in 1996.
Today, however, bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman Zawahiri, have fallen well behind their younger followers worldwide. The two still make speeches that must be recorded in a makeshift studio and couriered at considerable risk to al-Jazeera or other satellite stations, as with Zawahiri's message broadcast last week. Their younger adherents have moved on to Web sites and the production of short videos with shock appeal that can be distributed to millions instantly via the Internet.
Many online videos seek to replicate the Afghan training experience. An al Qaeda video library discovered on the Web and obtained by The Washington Post from an experienced researcher showed in a series of high-quality training films shot in Afghanistan how to conduct a roadside assassination, raid a house, shoot a rocket-propelled grenade, blow up a car, attack a village, destroy a bridge and fire an SA-7 surface-to-air missile. During a practice hostage-taking, the filmmakers chuckled as trainees herded men and women into a room, screaming in English, "Move! Move!"
One of al Qaeda's current Internet organizations, the Global Islamic Media Front, is now posting "a lot of training materials that we've been able to verify were used in Afghanistan," said Givner-Forbes, of the Terrorism Research Center. One recent online manual instructed how to extract explosive materials from missiles and land mines. Another offered a country-by-country list of "explosive materials available in Western markets," including France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the former Soviet Union and Britain.
These sites have converted sections of the Web into "an open university for jihad," said Reuven Paz, who heads the Project for the Research of Islamist Movements in Israel. "The main audience are the younger generation in the Arab world" who now can peruse at their own pace "one big madrassa on the Internet."
From One Site to Many
Al Qaeda's main communications vehicle after Sept. 11 was Alneda.com, a clearinghouse for new statements from bin Laden's leadership group as his grip on Afghan territory crumbled. An archive of the site, also obtained by The Post from the researcher, includes a library of pictures from the 2001 Afghan war, along with a collage of news accounts, long theological justifications for jihad, and celebrations of the Sept. 11 hijackers.
The webmaster and chief propagandist of the site has been identified by Western analysts as Yusuf Ayiri, a Saudi cleric and onetime al Qaeda instructor in Afghanistan. In the summer of 2002, U.S. authorities and volunteer campaigners who were trying to shut him down chased him across multiple computer servers. At one point, a pornographer gained control of the Alneda.com domain name, and the site shifted to servers in Malaysia, then Texas, then Michigan. Ayiri died in a gun battle with Saudi security forces in May 2003. His site ultimately disappeared.
Rather than one successor, there were hundreds.
Realizing that fixed Internet sites had become too vulnerable, al Qaeda and its affiliates turned to rapidly proliferating jihadist bulletin boards and Internet sites that offered free upload services where files could be stored. The outside attacks on sites like Alneda.com "forced the evolution of how jihadists are using the Internet to a more anonymous, more protected, more nomadic presence," said Ben N. Venzke, a U.S. government consultant whose firm IntelCenter monitors the sites. "The groups gave up on set sites and posted messages on discussion boards -- the perfect synergy. One of the best-known forums that emerged after Sept. 11 was Qalah, or Fortress. Registered to an address in Abu Dhabi, the United Arab Emirates, the site has been hosted in the U.S. by a Houston Internet provider, Everyone's Internet, that has also hosted a number of sites preaching radical Islam. Researchers who follow the site believe it may be connected to Saad Faqih, a leading Saudi dissident living in exile in Britain. They note that the same contact information is given for his acknowledged Web site and Qalah. Faqih has denied any link.
On Qalah, a potential al Qaeda recruit could find links to the latest in computer hacking techniques (in the discussion group called "electronic jihad"), the most recent beheading video from Iraq, and paeans to the Sept. 11 hijackers and long Koranic justifications of suicide attacks. Sawt al-Jihad, the online magazine of al Qaeda in Saudi Arabia, was available, as were long lists of "martyrs" who had died fighting in Iraq. The forum abruptly shut down on July 7, hours after a posting asserted responsibility for the London transit bombings that day in the name of the previously unknown Secret Organization of al Qaeda in Europe.
Until recently, al Qaeda's use of the Web appeared to be centered on communications: preaching, recruitment, community-building and broad incitement. But there is increasing evidence that al Qaeda and its offshoots are also using the Internet for tactical purposes, especially for training new adherents. "If you want to conduct an attack, you will find what you need on the Internet," said Rita Katz, director of the SITE Institute, a group that monitors and tracks the jihadist Internet sites.
Jarret Brachman, director of research at West Point's Combating Terrorism Center, said he recently found on the Internet a 1,300-page treatise by Nasar, the Spanish- and English-speaking al Qaeda leader who has long trained operatives in poison techniques. The book urged a campaign of media "resistance" waged on the Internet and implored young prospective fighters to study computers along with the Koran.
The Nasar book was posted anonymously on the hijacked server of a U.S. business, a tactic typical of online jihadist propagandists, whose webmasters steal space from vulnerable servers worldwide and hop from Web address to Web address to evade the campaigners against al Qaeda who seek to shut down their sites.
The movement has also innovated with great creativity to protect its most secret communications. Khalid Sheik Mohammed, a key planner of the Sept. 11 attacks later arrested in Pakistan, used what four researchers familiar with the technique called an electronic or virtual "dead drop" on the Web to avoid having his e-mails intercepted by eavesdroppers in the United States or allied governments. Mohammed or his operatives would open an account on a free, public e-mail service such as Hotmail, write a message in draft form, save it as a draft, then transmit the e-mail account name and password during chatter on a relatively secure message board, according to these researchers.
The intended recipient could then open the e-mail account and read the draft -- since no e-mail message was sent, there was a reduced risk of interception, the researchers said.
Matt Devost, president of the Terrorism Research Center, who has done research in the field for a decade, recalled that "silverbullet" was one of the passwords Mohammed reportedly used in this period. Sending fake streams of e-mail spam to disguise a single targeted message is another innovation used by jihadist communicators, specialists said.
Al Qaeda's success with such tactics has underscored the difficulty of gathering intelligence against the movement. Mohammed's e-mails, once discovered, "were the best actionable intelligence in the whole war" against bin Laden and his adherents, said Arquilla, the Naval Postgraduate School professor. But al Qaeda has been keenly aware of its electronic pursuers and has tried to do what it can to stay ahead -- mostly by using encryption.
Building Cells on the Web
In the last two years, a small number of cases have emerged in which jihadist cells appear to have formed among like-minded strangers who met online, according to intelligence officials and terrorism specialists. And there are many other cases in which bonds formed in the physical world have been sustained and nurtured by the Internet, according to specialists in and outside of government.
For example, Royal Canadian Mounted Police officers burst into the Ottawa home of Mohammed Momin Khawaja, a 24-year-old computer programmer, on March 29, 2004, arresting him for alleged complicity in what Canadian and British authorities described as a transatlantic plot to bomb targets in London and Canada. Khawaja, a contractor with Canada's Foreign Ministry, met his alleged British counterparts online and came to the attention of authorities only when he traveled to Britain and walked into a surveillance operation being conducted by British special police, according to two Western sources familiar with the case.
British prosecutors alleged in court that Khawaja met with his online acquaintances in an Internet cafe in London, where he showed them images of explosive devices found on the Web and told them how to detonate bombs using cell phones. The first person jailed under a strict new Canadian anti-terrorism law passed after Sept. 11, Khawaja is not scheduled to have a preliminary hearing on his case until January.
The transit attacks in London may also have an Internet connection, according to several analysts. They appear to be successful examples of "al Qaeda's assiduous effort to cultivate and train professional insurgents and urban warfare specialists via the Internet," wrote Scheuer, the former CIA analyst.
In a posting not long after the London attacks, a member of one of the al Qaeda-linked online forums asked how to take action himself. A cell of two or three people is better, replied another member in an exchange translated by the SITE Institute. Even better than that is a "virtual cell, an agreement between a group of brothers over the Internet." It is "safe," extolled the anonymous poster, and "nobody will know the identity of each other in the beginning." Once "harmony and mutual trust" are established, training conducted and videos watched, then "you can meet in reality and execute some operation in the field."
LONDON BOMBINGS
Press Releases from U.S. Department of Homeland Security
|
Transcript from Secretary Michael Chertoff Press Briefing on the London Bombings
For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary Contact: 202-282-8010 July 7, 2005
Secretary Chertoff: Ladies and gentlemen, good morning. This morning we are closely monitoring the bombings that occurred in London. I have spoken to the President and my counterpart, the Home Secretary in the United Kingdom. The thoughts and prayers of the American people are with the victims of this tragedy and with our friends in Britain.
In light of today's attacks in London, the United States government is raising the threat level from Code Yellow, or Elevated, to Code Orange, High; targeted only to the mass transit portion of the transportation sector -- and I want to emphasize that -- targeted only to the mass transit portion of the transportation sector. This includes regional and inner city passenger rail, subways, and metropolitan bus systems. We are also asking for increased vigilance throughout the transportation sector.
Currently, the United States has no specific, credible information suggesting an imminent attack here in the United States. However, we know the tactics and methods of terrorists as demonstrated by the horrific rail bombings last year in Madrid. The intent of al Qaeda and its affiliated organizations to attack in Europe and in the United States has been well documented and continues to be reflected in intelligence reporting.
We've already taken additional measures to secure transit systems since 9/11, and since the railway bombing in Madrid. At the direction of the President, we are working with the Department of Transportation, our other federal partners, state and local officials, and transportation authorities to take all necessary precautions and to increase the security of our transportation citizens -- systems and the citizens who ride them.
We have asked state and local leaders and transportation officials to increase their protective measures, including additional law enforcement police, bomb detecting canine teams, increased video surveillance, spot-testing in certain areas, added perimeter barriers, extra intrusion detection equipment, and increased numbers of inspection of trash receptacles and other storage areas.
We ask the public to remain alert and to report any suspicious activity, particularly in or around transportation systems to local police authorities. But we are not suggesting that people avoid public transportation systems; rather we are asking that they use those systems, but with an increased awareness of their surroundings.
We have been in continuous contact with federal, state and local authorities, as well as with our allies in the United Kingdom and overseas. We are concerned and we look to the United Kingdom authorities as they continue to investigate this incident. We are reviewing intelligence streams and information out of London very closely and will continue to provide regular updates to the public when information becomes available.
Again, our thoughts and prayers are with the British people and the grieving families. America stands with you in this time of crisis to assist and support you in every way possible. Terrorists may bomb and attack and attempt to use weapons of fear to shake the confidence and will of free nations and free people, but they will not succeed. We have a more powerful arsenal. It includes our resolution and our resiliency, an unyielding determination to do what we can and must to keep our citizens and our allies safe, and to track down those who perpetrate incidents like this and to bring them to justice.
Now, I thank you and I'll take a few questions before I get back to work.
Yes.
Question: What indication do you have that these attacks were caused by al Qaeda? And what credibility do you give the Internet message that was posted earlier this morning?
Secretary Chertoff: We obviously carefully evaluate any message, whether it be on the Internet or whether it comes in any other form to see whether it's credible. We're making those kinds of judgments as we speak. The Prime Minister has already indicated his presumption this is a terrorist act, and I think based on common sense, given what we've seen, that seems a pretty sensible prediction.
Yes, Pete.
Question: Mr. Secretary, do you know of any information that any similar attack is planned for the U.S.? And if not, why raise the terror threat level?
Secretary Chertoff: We don't have any specific credible information of an attack that's imminent in the United States. Nevertheless, I think prudence suggests that when we look at what happened in London, when we consider the typical way in which al Qaeda has carried out its tactics, which includes simultaneous activity in various places, common sense again tells us that we ought to make some reasonable adjustment in the threat level with respect to those elements of the transportation system which parallel what was the focus of attack in London. And I want to remind you at this point that, of course, we have a general elevated level of preparedness all across the country in terms of transportation and all other sectors, which we've had in place now for some years, and which does give us an increased sense of security, even on a day-to-day basis.
Yes.
Question: Was there any intelligence stream or chatter in the months before this to indicate that something like this was afoot, or did the London bombings take us completely by surprise?
Secretary Chertoff: I'm not aware of any specific intelligence that suggested this was going to take place. Again, obviously, for years now we've lived in an environment in which we've had general intelligence reporting about the intent of terrorists to carry out acts, both against us in the United States and against our allies. And it's been that mindfulness that has led us to, again, keep an elevated sense of preparedness as we go forward on a day-to-day basis.
But we're going to continue to review and see what intelligence is out there as we go forward in the future.
Question: Mr. Secretary, is there any calls for significant increases in funding to better secure transit? Senator Schumer said he proposes an extra $100 million be added to the budget. But do you think there's sufficient funds? Should more money be added to better secure transit by grant funds from DHS?
Secretary Chertoff: I think we are looking comprehensively at the issue of security policy. We've done a fairly extensive review over the last few months. And we're going to be coming out with some policy proposals about what we need to do to enhance our preparedness and to make sure we're doing the best we can to optimize the protection we give our infrastructure.
I wouldn't make a policy decision driven by a single event. I think our priority here is to get to the bottom of this, make sure we understand what the dimensions of this set of acts are, who perpetrated them, determine whether any lessons and intelligence that we're going to gain from this, and then move forward.
Question: Mr. Secretary, with the millions of commuters across our country, is it even possible to make these transit systems safe?
Secretary Chertoff: I think our transit systems are safe. And in the time period since 9/11, and, frankly, in the time period since Madrid, we've worked with Department of Transportation, with our state and local partners all across the country to raise the level of everyday protection. And that includes detection equipment, it includes police presence, it includes protocols. So I actually think we have a very safe system. But the fact remains, we've had an incident in London. We feel that at least in the short-term we should raise the level here because, obviously, we're concerned about the possibility of a copycat attack.
But again, we operate from a base line of preparedness that is much, much stronger than it was prior to 9/11, and, frankly, stronger than it was prior to Madrid. So I think that's something which ought to reassure the American public, whether they travel on trains, or whether they're in other forms of transportation.
Thank you very much.
Question: Have you moved any of your staff to alternate locations?
Secretary Chertoff: We're here. You can see I'm here. We're going to continue to monitor the situation. Again, we always as a matter of prudence have in place alternative measures if we need to take steps because of some kind of an interference with our ability to operate out of this facility. But again, this is not an occasion for undue anxiety. It's an occasion for a sense of sympathy and solidarity for our allies over in Britain, a renewal of our determination to keep our country safe, and a measured and appropriate response in terms of dealing with what has happened overseas.
Thanks very much.
From the Office of the President of the United States of America.
President Offers Condolences to People of London, Will Not Yield to Terrorists Gleneagles Hotel Auchterarder, Scotland
1:30 P.M. (Local)
PRESIDENT BUSH: I spent some time recently with the Prime Minister, Tony Blair, and had an opportunity to express our heartfelt condolences to the people of London, people who lost lives. I appreciate Prime Minister Blair's steadfast determination and his strength. He's on his way now to London here from the G8 to speak directly to the people of London. He'll carry a message of solidarity with him.
This morning I have been in contact with our Homeland Security folks. I instructed them to be in touch with local and state officials about the facts of what took place here and in London, and to be extra vigilant, as our folks start heading to work.
The contrast between what we've seen on the TV screens here, what's taken place in London and what's taking place here is incredibly vivid to me. On the one hand, we have people here who are working to alleviate poverty, to help rid the world of the pandemic of AIDS, working on ways to have a clean environment. And on the other hand, you've got people killing innocent people. And the contrast couldn't be clearer between the intentions and the hearts of those of us who care deeply about human rights and human liberty, and those who kill -- those who have got such evil in their heart that they will take the lives of innocent folks.
The war on terror goes on. I was most impressed by the resolve of all the leaders in the room. Their resolve is as strong as my resolve. And that is we will not yield to these people, will not yield to the terrorists. We will find them, we will bring them to justice, and at the same time, we will spread an ideology of hope and compassion that will overwhelm their ideology of hate.
Thank you very much.
END 1:32 P.M. (Local)
United States joins new World Customs Organization Framework of Standards
Reprinted from CBP website, www.cbp.gov.
(06/23/2005) On June 23, 2005, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Commissioner Robert C. Bonner submitted the United States’ “Declaration of Intent” to adopt the World Customs Organization (WCO) “Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade.” The United States was among the first nations to join the WCO’s newly adopted strategy to secure global trade.
 |

|
| Photo Credit: Gerald L. Nino | | |
 |
 |
The WCO consists of 166 member nations, representing 99 percent of global trade. The Framework represents the WCO’s effort to secure supply chains throughout the world, while allowing trade to move faster, smoother, and more predictably. For the first time in history, a common set of standards will be implemented to secure cargo moving into, through, and from all ports of the world. It is a global response to terrorists, organized criminals, smugglers, as well as other illegal activities.
“The adoption by the WCO of the Framework of Standards represents a global response to the threat of terrorism. The Framework makes safer, worldwide trade a reality,” Commissioner Bonner stated. “Its implementation by customs authorities around the world will revolutionize the security of trade, dealing a blow to international terrorists.”
“Through efforts such as the Container Security Initiative, Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism, and the 24-Hour Rule, CBP has taken unprecedented actions to secure America’s borders. Trade security must also be international in scope, and I applaud the WCO’s leadership in pursuing this global strategy,” Commissioner Bonner said.
Commissioner Bonner joined the Customs Director Generals of the European Union, Japan, Australia, and Canada in announcing their commitment to provide aid to the developing nations who exhibit the political will to implement the security Framework but require assistance to do so. Bonner also announced the creation of the Capacity Building Division within the CBP Office of International Affairs to help developing nations implement the Framework of security standards. This new CBP office will work closely with the Directorate for Capacity Building at the WCO Headquarters in Brussels, Belgium.
“Nations who exhibit a true will to purchase screening technology and implement minimum security measures will need – and deserve – assistance,” Bonner said. “Implementing these standards will improve the flow of trade for these smaller, developing nations thereby expanding their economies and improving the quality of life.”
IDENTITY THEFT
Reprinted from FBI website, www.fbi.gov.
I. General Overview
An identity theft is generally perpetrated to facilitate other crimes, such as credit card fraud, check fraud or mortgage fraud. Armed with a person's identifying information, an identity thief can open new accounts in the name of a victim, borrow funds in the victim's name or take over and withdraw funds from existing accounts of the victim, such as their checking account or their home equity line of credit. Although by far the most prevalent, these financial crimes are not the only criminal uses of identity theft information, which can even include evading detection by law enforcement in the commission of violent crimes. Identity theft takes many forms, but generally includes the acquiring of an individual's personal information such as Social Security number, date of birth, mother's maiden name, account numbers, address, etc., for use in criminal activities such as obtaining unauthorized credit and/or bank accounts for fraudulent means.
Identity theft has emerged as one of the dominant white collar crime problems of the 21st Century. Estimates vary regarding the true impact of the problem, but agreement exists that it is pervasive and growing. In addition to the significant harm caused to the monetary victims of the frauds, often providers of financial, governmental or other services, the individual victim of the identity theft may experience a severe loss in their ability to utilize their credit and their financial identity. This loss can be short in duration, or may extend for years. It may result in the inability to cash checks, obtain credit, purchase a home or, in the most insidious cases, the arrest of the individual for crimes committed by the identity thief.
A recent survey commissioned by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) estimated the number of consumer victims of identity theft over the year prior to the survey (which was completed in May 2003) at 4.6 percent of the population of U.S. consumers over the age of 18 (9.91 million individuals) with losses totaling $52.6 billion (47.6 billion to businesses and $5 billion to individual victims). However, over half of these victims experienced only the take-over of existing credit cards (5.17 million consumers) which is generally not considered identity theft. New account frauds, more generally considered to be identity theft, were estimated to have victimized 3.23 million consumers and to have resulted in losses of $36.7 billion ($32.9 billion to businesses and financial institutions and $3.8 billion to individuals). Recent research replicating this study for a subsequent twelve-month period obtained similar numbers.
The FBI is developing cooperative efforts to address the identity theft crime problem. In cities such as Detroit, Chicago, Memphis and Mobile, task forces are currently operating in conjunction with other federal, state and local authorities as well as with affected merchants. In cities such as Tampa, San Diego and Philadelphia, efforts are underway to create or expand identity theft working groups and task forces. In addition, the FBI is focusing analytical resources on identity theft, working with other agencies, such as the FTC, to obtain identity theft data and utilize it to proactively identify and target organized criminal groups and enterprises.
In the area of identity theft, task forces, such as those currently operating in the Detroit and Chicago areas, partner with large local retailers to address the identity theft crime problem. Those retailers have analysts and/or security officers who are active members of the task forces. Since 2003, the Chicago Metro Identity Fraud Task Force has executed 18 search warrants, made 13 controlled deliveries, served four arrest warrants, made 39 arrests, and obtained 11 indictments and 37 prosecutions. During the same period, the Detroit Metro Identity Theft Task Force has executed 45 search warrants, served 54 arrest warrants, made 81 arrests, and obtained 36 indictments and 19 prosecutions. In addition, the FBI sponsors a national Identity Theft Working Group, where participants from law enforcement, federal regulatory bodies and the financial services industry, meet on a regular basis to discuss topics related to identity theft and to work on fostering cooperation and developing long term solutions to the problem.
The success that can be achieved by this cooperation is demonstrated by the investigation of Philip A. Cummings, who was a computer help-desk employee at a company which provided customers with computerized access to the three commercial credit history bureaus. As part of his employment, Cummings had access to confidential passwords and subscriber codes for customers who utilized the company's software to download consumer credit histories. Cummings, along with a co-conspirator, downloaded more than 30,000 consumer credit histories from early 2000 through October 2002 and sold them to other conspirators who utilized them to commit identity theft. The close cooperation with the FBI of one of those major credit history bureaus was instrumental in the successful investigation of what is believed to be the largest identity theft scheme ever prosecuted and in dealing with the resulting effect on the large number of victims. Losses to financial institutions in this case exceeded $11 million. Cummings plead guilty and was sentenced to 14 years' imprisonment.
II. Overall Accomplishments
As Identity Theft case data was not provided prior to June 2003, statistical accomplishments will reflect Fiscal Year 2003 through Second Quarter, Fiscal Year 2005. At the close of Fiscal Year 2004, the FBI had 1,574 pending investigations involving identity theft activity. These cases covered a broad range of investigative classifications.







III. Significant Cases
PHILIP J. CUMMINGS (NEW YORK): On September 14, 2004, Philip J. Cummings, former Telecommunications Data, Inc., technical support representative, pled guilty in U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, to one count of Title (T) 18, U.S. Code (USC), Section 1343, Wire Fraud, one count of T18, USC, Section 1028, Fraud Related to Identification Documents and Information and one count of T18, USC, Section 371, Conspiracy, for his participation in a massive scheme to steal the identities of individuals which defrauded financial institutions of more than $11 million. It was alleged that Cummings stole the passwords and access codes of Ford Motor Credit and other financial companies to access Equifax, Trans Union, and Experian credit report records and downloaded credit report information on 30,000 individuals. These credit reports were allegedly sold to a group of co-conspirators.
RICHARD BURLEY; TIMOTHY CLARK; ET AL (DETROIT): On September 1, 2004, captioned subjects were charged in U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, on bank fraud and conspiracy charges for their alleged roles in an identity theft ring which derived profits of more than $2 million. This indictment was the result of the investigative efforts of the Detroit Metro Identity Fraud Task Force (DMIFTF). The DMIFTF comprises agents from the FBI, U.S. Postal Inspection Service, United States Secret Service, the Michigan State Police, and several local police departments. Since its inception in 1999, the DMIFTF has accounted for more than 100 convictions for identity theft- related crimes.
IDENTITY THEFT TIPS
Indications of Identity Theft
The following occurrences are some of the indications of identity theft:
• Charges occurring on your accounts that you did not authorize. • If your credit is denied due to poor credit ratings, despite good credit history. • If you are contacted by creditors regarding amounts owed for goods or services that you never obtained or authorized. • If your credit card and bank statements are not received in the mail as expected. • If a new or renewed credit card is not received.
Identity Theft/Fraud Prevention Measures
U.S. citizens need to be aware of measures that can be taken to either prevent or minimize their chances of becoming a victim of fraud. Some of these measures are as follows:
• Never give personal information via telephone, mail or Internet, unless you initiated the contact. • Store personal information in a safe place. • Shred credit card receipts and/or old statements before discarding in a garbage can--If you do not have a shredder, then use scissors. • Protect PINs and passwords. • Carry only the minimum amount of identifying information. • Remove your name from mailing lists for pre-approved credit lines and tele-marketers. • Order and closely review biannual copies of your credit report from each national credit reporting agency (Equifax, Experian, and Trans Union). • Request DMV to assign an alternate driver's license number if it currently features your Social Security Account Number. • Ensure that your PIN numbers cannot be observed by anyone while utilizing an ATM or public telephone. • Close all unused credit card or bank accounts. • Contact your creditor or service provider if expected bills do not arrive. • Check account statements carefully. • Guard your mail from theft. • BE AWARE!
If You are a Victim of Identity Theft
These steps are among those that should be completed by persons who believe they have been the victim of an identity theft:
• Contact the fraud departments for the three major credit bureaus to place fraud alerts on your credit file in order to reduce your risk of further victimization. • Obtain and review a current copy of your credit report to determine whether any unknown fraud has occurred--(You will need to more closely monitor your credit going forward as some identity thefts can continue for extended periods of time). • Contact the account issuer(s) where fraudulent accounts have been opened or where your accounts have been taken over--Ask for the fraud/security department and notify them both via telephone and in writing. • Close all tampered or fraudulent accounts. • Ask about the existence of secondary cards. • Contact your local police department and file a police report. • Notify the police department in the community where the identity theft occurred, if it is different from your own. • Obtain copies of any police reports filed. • Keep a detailed log of who you talked to and when, including their title, phone number, and other contact information. • Contact the Federal Trade Commission's Identity Theft Clearinghouse and file an identity theft complaint at www.consumer.gov. Those complaints are utilized by law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, that investigate identity theft. You can also obtain additional information at that website regarding your rights as a victim. • Online identity thefts can also be reported at www.ic3.gov. |
|